Skip to main content

Cameron's dubious promises for the future

Newsflash: Cameron announces £1200 "childcare support" for after the election in 2015 to replace some of the £1500 child benefit that was removed in January.  (See Guardian article).

David Cameron has made yet another commitment to deflect criticism.  He promised a referendum in 2017 to stifle the anti-EU faction in his party and is now promising welfare reforms for old people in 2017.

The Tories are unlikely to be in power in 2017.  Labour has already said it is unlikely to support an EU referendum in 2017 and no-one can guarantee that Cameron's welfare reforms will be enacted.  These promises for 2017 do not even carry the weight of manifesto commitments.

After his EU "initiative" Cameron realised that promising changes in 2017 was widely publicised by the press and that journalists accepted this as a credible policy initiative.  Having realised that he can fool the press so easily he is using the same ploy again.  Shame on the journalists for being so stupid.  Shame on us if we do not realise that Cameron is mocking us, treating us as stupid, brainless children.

On the subject of the supposed welfare reforms, they would be a measure to preserve the riches of the very rich and destroy the middle classes.  A £75000 cap on nursing fees means that a married couple would need to spend about £150000 each on BOTH nursing and accommodation before the relief occurs so a married couple would need to spend £300000 before getting assistance.  This is enough to ensure that any middle class people would sell their house before obtaining welfare in old age.  If you had a million pounds then the cap would be a great improvement on the current situation, giving you a subsidy for expensive nursing fees.



If you found this article interesting link to it, tweet it (TinyURL  http://tinyurl.com/a8smdgq ),  and tell your friends! Don't let the the Tories treat us like children.

POLITICAL THOUGHTS click here to see the whole POLITICAL THOUGHTS magazine POLITICAL THOUGHTS!


See also:

Cameron appears to be moron:Kashmir and the USA

David Cameron: Banker boy turned Hedge Fund man

Cameron adds EU referendum to Tory manifesto

Cameron, Obama, Britain and the EU


Note: "Families with one parent with a taxable income of more than £50,000 will lose some of the benefit, and it will be withdrawn entirely if one parent earns above £60,000" BBC 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...