Skip to main content

The Falklands and Nazism - Malvinas and Nazism

It is curious that between 1889 and 1941 there were no protests by the Argentines to the British about "Las Malvinas" - the Falkland Islands (see note).  The lack of protests was a natural result of the 1849/50 "Convention between Great Britain and the Argentine Confederation" where Argentina relinquished all claims to the Falklands. 

Why did the claims start again in 1941? In 1941 Juan Peron returned from almost 4 years in Italy and Germany where he learnt Nazism.  Peron describes his conversion:

"Italian Fascism led popular organizations to an effective participation in national life, which had always been denied to the people. Before Mussolini's rise to power, the nation was on one hand and the worker on the other, and the latter had no involvement in the former. [...] In Germany happened exactly the same phenomenon, meaning, an organized state for a perfectly ordered community, for a perfectly ordered population as well: a community where the state was the tool of the nation, whose representation was, under my view, effective. I thought that this should be the future political form, meaning, the true people's democracy, the true social democracy" Juan Peron.

The Second World War was raging in 1941 and Argentina maintained a neutral position which often favoured the Germans.  The Germans were particularly keen to capture the Falkland Islands because they allowed the allies to control the route from the Atlantic to the Pacific.  Simply raising an Argentine claim to the Falklands in 1941 was a pro-German action.
 
When Peron returned to Argentina he became part of the "United Officers Group" which, in 1943 mounted a coup and seized power in Argentina and formed an extreme right wing government.   There can be little doubt from their social policies and actions that the United Officers Group were closely aligned with Nazi aspirations and German war aims.

President Farrell and Vice President Peron, courtesy Wikipedia
What Peron learnt from his German inspired activities was that the cry "Las Malvinas son Argentinas!" could be used to rouse Argentine nationalism and racism.  The gringos had stolen part of Argentina!  It was not only Peron who learnt this lesson.  If there were domestic problems every succeeding government would chant "Las Malvinas son Argentinas!".

The bulk of the Argentine population were uneducated and, seeing the Falklands lying off their coast, yet ruled as a British dependency, were incensed that the British had stolen what appeared to be rightly theirs.  Of course, being uneducated, they did not understand that the Falklands only became "offshore" after the genocidal invasion of Patagonia in 1880 and that it was an Anglo-Spanish territory that had been occupied by the British, not an Argentine territory at all.  No-one told them that the Spanish had recognised the British residence in West Falkland in 1771 and had relinquished their part of the islands to the British in 1860 and all the inhabitants were British. (Yes, the Islands were of such strategic importance that Britain prevented the United Provinces of South America from seizing them from Spain.)

So, thanks to Nazi aspirations in the Second World War the population of the Falkland Islands are under perpetual threat of invasion and being colonised by Argentina.  Many South Americans are supporting the Argentines, and the Brazilians, Venezuelans and Uruguayans are particularly keen to see the Islands violently colonised.  As colonisers they can see nothing wrong with neo-colonialism.   The South American members of the UN Decolonisation Committee largely support Argentine colonisation of the Islands. It is bizarre that in the 21st century a UN committee is being subverted by colonists to further their colonialist dreams. The UN Committee should be replaced by a body composed of indigenous peoples to stop this farce of the oppressors representing the oppressed.

(Incidentally, the fascists managed to get a law passed in the 1930s that makes "Las Malvinas son Argentinas" compulsory education in Argentine schools, a law that continues to this day).

Also see:

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas 

Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina and Las Malvinas for a discussion of the UN Resolutions and history.

Is the UN Decolonization Committee corrupt?

Colonialism? Its the Colonists Stupid! 

The Argentine case for Las Malvinas

Pigna, Felipe (2008). Los mitos de la historia argentina 4. Buenos Aires: Editorial Planeta. p. 28. ISBN 978-950-49-1980-3. "El fascismo italiano llevó a las organizaciones populares a una participación efectiva en la vida nacional, de la cual había estado siempre apartado el pueblo. Hasta la ascensión de Mussolini al poder, la nación iba por un lado y el trabajador por otro, y éste último no tenía ninguna participación en aquella. [...] En alemania ocurría exactamente el mismo fenómeno, o sea, un estado organizado para una comunidad perfectamente ordenada, para un pueblo perfectamente ordenado también; una comunidad donde el estado era el instrumento de ese pueblo, cuya representación era, a mi juicio, efectiva. Pensé que tal debería ser la forma política del futuro, es decir, la verdadera democracia popular, la verdadera democracia social."

Note: This embarrassing gap in protests is denied by Argentina which maintains that there were protests during discussions in Buenos Aires on Radio Telegraphy and Venereal Disease in 1925 and 1926 and that these protests constitute sovereignty claims.  See Protest lodged by Foreign Minister Angel Gallardo with the British Minister in Buenos Aires, Sir Malcolm Arnold Robertson, Nov. 30, 1925, in MUNOZ AZPIRI, supra note 7, at 365. and correspondence between Gallardo and the Belgian Minister in Buenos Aires Count Robert van der Straten Ponthoz in respect of the extension of the Bruxelles Convention of Dec. I, 1924 to the Islands. In his letter of Dec. 28, 1926 the Belgian diplomat confirms to have communicated Gallardo's protest to his Government.Id. at 368-69.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...