Skip to main content

Science in Parliament

I have been searching around for details of the degree subjects of Members of Parliament.  Especially science degrees. Here are some resources:

The Social Background of MPs notes that about 75% of MPs have degrees, 25% have degrees from Oxbridge and about 33% went to private schools.

Dr Phillip Lee's Blog, Dr Lee is a conservative Member of Parliament who notes that whilst over half the Cabinet have philosophy, politics, economics and history degrees only 1 has a science degree (this member has now left).

To discover the exact answer I would need to be a registered member of a Westminster Parliamentary Record website.  Fortunately someone has already done this and found that of 617 Members of Parliament 27 have science or technology degrees.

So of the approximately 462 MPs who have degrees 6% have science degrees (If maths, engineering and medicine are included this figure is near 11%). Some 44% of all full time degree enrollments are in science subjects

There is obviously a process of attrition of scientifically trained people (I use the term "scientifically trained" because only half or less of those with science degrees become scientists). Only a seventh as many science trained people get selected to be MPs as non-scientists and those with science degrees are only a seventh as likely as their colleagues to get to Cabinet.  If such discrimination were occurring on the basis of skin colour or sex there would be a national scandal.

Part of the reason for the attrition of the scientifically trained should be obvious to anyone who has ever been involved in public service.  Scientists find it difficult to reject the truth.  This causes friction because it becomes impossible to trade off the false and absurd plans of one politician to buy progress for the false plans of another politician.

POLITICAL THOUGHTS click here to see the whole POLITICAL THOUGHTS magazine!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...