Skip to main content

Nations are the unit of cultural diversity

The historical and archaeological records are quite clear that tribes became nations and nations became subsumed into larger nations and empires.

A mature nation consists of tribes that have, over time, largely merged their cultures so that there is a single national culture.  Nations where the tribes are still culturally separate tend to fly apart into entities based on the tribe.

 An empire is a combination of nations that may or may not be forced to share a single culture.  The early Islamic Empires and Christian Empires often enforced a common religion and hence culture (sometimes at the point of a sword and sometimes through excess taxation and exclusion).  In contrast the trading empires run by the eighteenth and nineteenth century French and British tended to allow nations within the empires to keep their cultures. The dystopian Communist empires of the twentieth century forced the subject nations to share a common culture. The passing or weakening of an empire results in the re-appearance of those separate nations within it that have managed to preserve their cultures.

The reason that nations are the natural unit of diversity is that culture governs the behaviour of the people. When people share a culture they share behaviour and will accept a common set of governing principles.

The way to destroy a nation is to impose multiculturalism, either by importing tribes from elsewhere or by forcibly or otherwise changing the religion of a segment of the population.  This multiculturalism is not the imposition of a variety of restaurants but the true imposition of a divided, segregated society (see Multiculturalism).  The British Empire did this in various places such as Sri Lanka and Northern Ireland, the Chinese are doing it in Tibet and the Russians are also at it.  The Nation is then returned to a set of tribes and loses any sense of national purpose or suffers civil war.

Globalization is an imperial fad that will pass and nations absorbed by it will largely re-emerge when it has gone.  Those nations, such as the UK, that have been tribalised by the globalizers will need to go through a new period of maturation that could last centuries. 

The only stable world is a world where nations interact according to an international law yet preserve their cultural identities and sovereignty.  This preserves the essential diversity that is required to deal with unexpected events, whether these are environmental, political, biological or economic.  Economists and post-modernists do not understand this need for many nations and are storing up problems for the future.

The maverick nation in this discussion is the USA.  It has imported large numbers of people who are committed to its national culture so that, despite being composed of people from all over the world, it is a true nation rather than an empire.  The only danger for the USA as a nation is that the people who share a common origin within it will coalesce into tribes.   The USA has always tackled this possibility by carefully indoctrinating the population with national values, if, in this post-modern world, it neglects to do this then it will lose cohesion.

The EU was a stable coalition of nations until it introduced a single currency.  The Eurozone is now in the process of becoming an empire.

We can only have freedom within national units, these units can differ dramatically and hence one nation can tolerate a subculture that would cause another to explode.

See also:

Multiculturalism

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...