Communism did not deliver what it promised

There is an excellent source of comparative economic data at the The Groningen Growth and Development Centre. Using this data the GDP per head of a range of countries was plotted:

The sudden dip in the communist data for the ex-Soviet Union and Eastern Europe was probably due to a mixture of erroneous reporting of GDP prior to liberation and excessive activity in the defence and non-productive state sectors which disappeared after liberation (See Russia's Comparative Economic Development in the Long Run, Vitali A. Meliantsev, Moscow Lomonossov University)). If this is taken into account then the communist countries scarcely grew at all between 1950 and 1989 in comparison with the West. Since economic liberation these countries are now showing relatively strong growth. Unlike the suspect growth in the communist era, this recent growth is credible because it is based on statistics that are overviewed by organisations like the OECD. China still requires political liberation however, and Russia is in a perilous political state.

Marx worked out that if a state were run like a single corporation with a managing board run by Marxist idealists then everyone would be richer. This is obvious tosh and it is no surprise that it has failed to deliver. It is sometimes said that Marxism has not truly been implemented in any country, this is a false claim because all communist countries have turned the state into a single corporation with a governing board and, inevitably given this constitution, the board or the Chief Executive Officer becomes a tyrant.

So why does Marxism persist? Why are there so many students who ignore the truth? What happens is that a bunch of people join Marxist gangs when they are at university to give themselves a sense of purpose and belonging. Some young people join street gangs, some students join Marxist-Leninist gangs. Street gangs end up in knifings, Marxist-Leninist gangs make entire countries suffer. Communism is a gang mentality that persists into adulthood.

See

Communism and the education system

Marxism and the credit crunch

Comments

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith. What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas? In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands. The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata. The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile. In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president. Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer, recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue? What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems. Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out. The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark. Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions. The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage

Political Thoughts - the magazine

Search This Blog