Skip to main content

Levelling and Lollardy

Courtesy Wikipedia
Levelling and Lollardy are aspects of English culture that have been suppressed by the Establishment. They are two of the greatest achievements in global political and philosophical history being at the root of the modern era from the Glorious Revolution to the American Constitution and the Industrial Age.

Lollardy was the form of protestantism that arose in England in the 14th century. It was the idea that people should take their belief directly from scripture and gave rise to the first translation of the bible into English. It was central to the Peasant's Revolt of 1381 and is summed up in the Lollard John Ball's sermon:

"When Adam delved and Eve span, Who was then the gentleman? From the beginning all men by nature were created alike, and our bondage or servitude came in by the unjust oppression of naughty men. For if God would have had any bondmen from the beginning, he would have appointed who should be bond, and who free. And therefore I exhort you to consider that now the time is come, appointed to us by God, in which ye may (if ye will) cast off the yoke of bondage, and recover liberty."

Lollardy was popular in the fifteenth century but was brutally suppressed. It has become usual for historians to dismiss Lollardy as of no consequence but several features of British history are inexplicable without it. Most importantly the Reformation and the establishment of the Church of England are direct results of Lollardy. Had the population not been already primed with protestantism they would not have accepted the new protestant church with enthusiasm. Protestants who died at the stake for their beliefs in the religious turmoil of the 16th century did not die for Henry VIII or for the state, they died because deep seated protestant beliefs were embedded in England before Henry. An excerpt of an article based on church records is appended below that shows that those who died at the stake in the early 16th century were Lollards.

The lack of any documentary connection between Lollardy, in say 1420, and the Reformation Parliament of 1529 that began the move to a Church of England is due to the suppression and destruction of written records, it does not mean Lollardy was not the root of the English Church.  There is some evidence for the survival of Lollardy, for instance Thomas Cromwell was in contact with Thames Valley Lollards.

 In 1529, at the birth of the English Church there were plenty of people whose grandparents had openly been Lollards or killed for being Lollards, we do not need a documentary record to see the connection between Lollardy and English protestantism. Indeed, those who dismiss such a connection are trying to pull the wool over our eyes. Calvinists, Lutherians, and Catholics would have it otherwise but the Church of England was the English church.

Lollard sentiments did not end in the sixteenth century but continued in the seventeenth in the form of Levelling.  The Levellers were the political movement of the rank and file of Cromwell's New Model Army during the Civil War (1642–1651). Levellers were of the Lollard belief that scripture should be the source of religious inspiration and that men were equal under God and believed all men should have equal representation in Parliament. The Putney Debates contain political sentiments that are directly related to those of John Ball and Levelling was seventeenth century Lollardy, for instance Rainborough says:

"For really I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest he; and therefore truly, sir, I think it’s clear, that every man that is to live under a government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that government;.."

It is often forgotten that the Civil War was about Levelling, Levelling was what everyone was fighting about. The beliefs of the Levellers changed the climate of political opinion in seventeenth century England. This new climate of opinion gave rise to the 1688 constitution and the modern political era.

As an Englishman I can testify that until the middle of the last century the ordinary English were Levellers. The creepy histories of the English written by upper class or parvenu authors miss this essential element of Englishness entirely. When I was a boy in Sussex the working class Englishmen would swear with every other word, often believed in God but on their own terms and considered the upper and middle classes to be c**ts. These were dangerous people and they have been written out of histories and expunged from our new media consciousness.

We must look forward to a new England now and turn the New English towards those ancient Levelling ideals of the free and independent Englishman.



See The 400th Anniversary of the King James' Bible.

23/11/10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...