Skip to main content

Bans on psychoactive substances are part of EU drug policy

According to the EU Drugs Policy ( 17/9/2013 ) all new psychoactive substances must be submitted for a risk assessment by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) and cannot be sold without such an assessment.  This effectively terminates the sale of "legal highs" without a review for risk.

At the beginning of July 2014, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) declared that legal highs are not classified as pharmaceutical products and are not prohibited provided they are not covered by the Narcotics Acts. The Federal Republic of Germany had ruled that legal highs are unsafe pharmaceutical products, but the ECJ overruled this interpretation. So personal use, rather than sale, of non-classified drugs is not illegal.

All EU countries are amending their drug legislation to take account of the EU approach.  Many, such as Ireland, have simply banned the sale of all psychoactive substances except those that are explicitly permitted. The UK has introduced the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 that comes into force in April and is similar to the Irish approach.

The current position seems to be that previously "legal" highs and new highs cannot be sold without a risk assessment and it is unlikely that such an assessment will be positive.  Even if the highs were found to be low risk in the UK or Ireland it would be illegal to sell them from April.  Possession of small quantities of a now, dubiously legal, low risk high, that is not covered specifically in the narcotics acts is probably not illegal.  All highs will be included under the EU Narcotic Acts if deemed by the EMCDDA to be of moderate or higher risk.

The essential point here is that the policy is being driven from Brussels.  We may agree with it in this instance but suppose it was a policy that we did not like?  In the future EU policies can be left or right, racist or liberal etc. and the UK can do nothing but follow.

15/2/16

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

Do Muslim women want to wear the Burka (Burqua)?

Do all islamic women want to wear burka?  Can a woman's freedom to wear what she wants oppress other women?  Are western feminists aiding a cult that is dedicated to the destruction of feminism?  I hope to answer these questions in this article.  I would much appreciate any comments you might have if you disagree with the article, especially if you have a feminist viewpoint. Here is a description of the problems of wearing burka by a woman of Asian origin: "Of course, many veiled Muslim women argue that, far from being forced to wear burkas by ruthless husbands, they do so out of choice. And I have to take them at their word. But it is also very apparent that many women are forced behind the veil. A number of them have turned up at my door seeking refuge from their fathers, mothers, brothers and in-laws - men brain-washed by religious leaders who use physical and mental abuse to compel the girls to cover up. It started with the headscarf, then went to th...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...