Skip to main content

Why don't the English want to be in the EU?

Without the Scots and Northern Irish the vote for Independence in the EU Referendum would have been overwhelming:


If there were to be a Second Referendum on EU Membership, so breaking the "once in a generation" rule on referendums, the Scottish and Northern Irish should be given Independence Referendums first so that any doubt about whether they wish to be part of the UK is resolved.  It would be absurd for those who are leaving the UK to determine the future of the whole UK.

The most obvious reason that the English do not want to be in the EU is that England is culturally distinct from the rest of Europe as can be seen from the Inglehart–Welzel Cultural Map:
The Northern Irish are distinct from the English and, although not shown, we might suspect that the Scots are also distinct.

The huge difference between Great Britain and most of the EU lies in the importance of Individualism.  Much of the EU is Communitarian (corporatist - see Note 1) in that it's people tend to believe that a human being is defined by their role in society.  The English tend to believe that an individual finds their own path in life and that this defines them.

When the Balkans were freed from Soviet domination they reverted to their pre-WWII cultural divisions, similarly the Russians have reverted to pre-Soviet models of society having dabbled in democracy.  Cultural roots cannot be easily discarded.  Now that the EU has been free from Anglo-American cultural and military domination for over 20 years it is also reverting to its Communitarian roots.  It is certain that most of those English people who support continuing membership of the EU as it moves towards a "United States of Europe" do not understand that its ultimate destiny is the National Socialism of Napoleon where racism is expressed as homogenisation rather than extermination (See for instance the economic analysis in The Origins of the EU).  Now that National Rally, 5 Star and other so-called "populist" movements in Europe have accepted the permanence of the EU we can expect a rapid fulfillment of its cultural destiny. It is not racist to accept that other countries can have different cultures and that the cultural diversity of humanity is wonderful.  It is racist to demand that we should all be the same. The English must leave.


Note 1: Those who believe sincerely that the UK should be part of the developing EU and become part of an EU state are usually serious corporatists.

See The Great War: Corporatism vs Freedom and Corporatism and Communitarianism









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H...