Skip to main content

New Year Predictions for 2019

The most striking event of the past year and, in retrospect, of the decade, is the continuing rise of the Media Industry (Television, Film, News, Advertising, Social Media, Internet Sales, Computer Games etc).  It is now worth over $2 trillion worldwide.  In the UK alone it is worth about £100 bn.  This rise, coupled with immersion in smart phones, has created a new society of detached, networked people.  When this post-modern cloud of humanity touches opposition it can usually simply sweep it aside.  Those who control it can create angry, closed groups to influence the world outside.  These are the last years when those who tend their gardens, visit friends and family regularly and attend physical political meetings and social events will have influence.  Who will rule then?

In the UK the Brexit debate is resolving into three options.  The first is to pass Theresa May's Withdrawal Agreement, the second is to leave the EU without a deal (or with a rudimentary set of agreements) and the third is to postpone Brexit.  There is a great deal of talk about Second Referendums but realistically such possibilities would take a year or more to come to pass.

If Theresa May is at all competent, and we must doubt this, expect the vote on the Withdrawal Agreement to be delayed until the last possible moment (perhaps 21st January).  It is only when the Irish are faced with the imminent possibility of definite borders after a no-deal Brexit that they will change their backstop from a perpetual Customs Union to a condition with an expiry date or a clear mechanism for removal.  If the Irish agree to this change the Withdrawal Agreement will, reluctantly, be approved by the UK Parliament.

If the Irish stick to their guns, something they are famed for doing, then Parliament will be faced with a battle between leaving with a rudimentary deal on March 29th or delaying Brexit.  The problem with the second option is that there is no other deal available so delaying Brexit is equivalent to refusing to implement it, delaying Brexit for second referendums etc. will be evidence of this refusal.

The greatest beneficiaries of "seamless" trade are the Media Corporations whose Network operates across all borders except the Chinese and acouple of Islamic countries.  If Brexit were delayed they will devote every resource to try to overturn it.  If this comes to pass we should all turn off our televisions, radios and social media to avoid indoctrination but we won't.

It looks like 2019 is going to be a poor year for the global economy, not terrible and not good.

The lowered industrial production in 2018 will feed through in early 2019 into a small decrease in GDP growth for many countries. Global population growth is about 1% a year so any increase in Industrial Production below 1% per annum is actually a fall in production per head. The whole world has not been getting much richer since 2012.

The stock markets of the world were overheated in 2017-18 and have been adjusting in the last quarter of 2018.  They are now not far off the long term price earnings ratio of around 15:1. Expect a slight overshoot of stock prices downwards followed by a small recovery later in the year.

The UK economy will be steady during 2019, Brexit or no Brexit.  The role of the EU in the UK economy has been massively overhyped by the Multinational Controlled Media.

Even a large, £20bn loss of exports to the EU will pan out at less than 0.5% fall in GDP because some of these exports will be sold elsewhere and there is £10bn + in tariffs to be collected from imports from the EU.  A No Deal Brexit would not be a particularly big deal despite the Bank of England and Treasury repeating Project Fear.

When Parliament finally, creepily, overturns the Referendum we British should continue to fight the EU Nationalists, but will we all remember never to vote Labour, Tory of Lib Dem again?



















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage