Skip to main content

The benefit of the EU for UK Trade and Industry.

In this article I will explore how much benefit the UK obtains from being inside
the EU.  Most articles about the benefits of the EU simply state the growth in trade between the EU and the UK but  I will also compare the UK with other countries to show the comparative benefit that the EU has delivered.

If the EU is beneficial to the UK it should be obvious that UK-EU exports should be growing faster than the exports from other countries in general to the EU.  In the table below the growth in trade with the EU since 1993 is compared between countries.

It should shock the reader to discover that exports grew less between the UK and the EU than they did between Russia, China or the USA and the EU .  All of these countries are not EU members but enjoyed a better export growth with the EU than the UK. Being a member of the EU was not a trading advantage for the UK. 

In fact the UK is 28th in terms of export growth with the EU.  EU financed pressure groups say how wonderful it is to be in the EU, just look, 81% growth in exports since 1993 but almost all trading nations outside the EU did better than the UK, for instance Canada and New Zealand increased their exports with the EU by over 140% in this period.

It is also surprising that the UK did badly in services exports to the EU, being 22nd in the league and notching up only 53% growth.

Most of the rest of the world did better than the UK at exporting to Europe during the years 1993 to 2011.


So, where did the UK score export success?  Did the UK perform better exporting outside the EU? The table below summarizes the top 33 sources of UK export growth :


The UK did best exporting to the rest of the world rather than to the EU.  Perhaps the UK needs to look outwards from the EU and stop being so xenophobic.  Fortunately this is beginning to happen:

Growth of Export Potential ONS Data
UK Exports


Shaking off the UK's EU based xenophobia has resulted in more export trade between the UK and non-EU countries than between the EU and the UK in the past 3 years.
 
Something odd is going on here, it is almost as if the UK is being positively disadvantaged by being in the EU.  If being inside the EU is positively damaging the UK we should see an accelerating deficit in trade with the EU compared with trade with other countries.  

Data: ONS Balance of Payments 2014 - Goods + Services Excel Table

As can be seen from the graph above, there is something about trade with the EU that is positively disadvantageous to the UK.  The UK can trade at a surplus with the rest of the world but there is some factor in the way that the EU "free" market is constructed that is causing huge losses and damaging British interests.  It is conventional to blame UK exporters for failure to export to the EU but they are excellent at global exporting and only neutral at EU exporting so something else is happening  (see  The Imbalance of UK-EU Trade and its Consequences for a full explanation of the trade deficit with the EU).

A Quarterly Trade deficit of over £15,000 million pounds with the EU is a deficit of crisis proportions. The full balance of payments deficit with the EU is even worse, at about £100 billion last year (See Membership of the EU: Pros and Cons).  On closer analysis it is the growing deficit in sales of goods and the almost flatlining of service sales to the EU that are causing this large deficit.


Most of these EU goods come from Germany which uses a currency that is relatively low in value because Germany does not bear the social costs of the Euro in Southern Europe.

A recent study, "Change or Go" has analysed some of the reasons why the UK is doing so badly from its association with the EU.  The basic message is that leaving the EU would not hurt our exporters at all.  Europe does not have very high trade tariffs against the rest of the world, as is shown by the success of countries like Canada and China at exporting to Europe. if the UK left the EU there would be no massive barriers to exporting to the EU.

"Change or Go" is summarized in the Daily Telegraph article: Why Leaving the EU would not be a Disaster for the UK's Exporters. It says that inside the EU: "The UK currently spends a net £11.3bn for the privilege of being a member of the EU and obtaining (mostly) tariff-free access to 56 markets. Outside, in the Worst Case Scenario, access to those same 56 markets would cost £7.4bn.".  It also exposes why it is easy to get a few prominent businessmen to avidly support the case for the EU when the statistics say the opposite: "Businesses responsible for less than 5pc of Britain’s exports to the whole world bear nearly three-quarters of the cost [of leaving the EU], a degree of concentration that would allow targeted government assistance to be delivered to those most affected.".

What Change or Go does not emphasize is that many non-EU countries pay almost no tariffs at all to the EU; Canadians export whiskey duty free and a Japan-EU Free Trade Agreement is about to be finalized so that Honda can export directly - see The Great Myth of EU Tariffs.

In conclusion it can be said that membership of the EU is a serious disadvantage for UK Trade and Industry and it is leading to a huge balance of trade deficit.

When you vote in the referendum there will be no turning back, please remember that your children and your children's children will be deprived of independence if we Remain.

Link to this article in Twitter with http://tinyurl.com/l36jvux

Principle sources:

ONS

Where’s The Insider Advantage? Michael Burrage, 2012.

Also see:

Membership of the EU: Pros and Cons



Written 12/5/15






















Comments

Robin Smith said…
With all due respect this is only looking at part of the whole. Industry is only a tiny part of UK earnings. Our biggest earner is our ownership of parts of other nations through 'mortgage'. The interest we get on loans is effectively a tribute in economic rent.

http://www.meltfund.com/2013/07/meltfund-mortgage-total-market-size.html
John said…
Yes, when you consider the whole balance of payments the deficit is over £100 billion per annum. Totally disastrous.

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage