Skip to main content

Why modern anti-racists are racist

Modern Anti-Racism
Most people have watched TV debates where someone is called "racist" and then everyone turns, like a pack of jackals,  to tear the reputation of the "racist" to shreds.  We have all seen media frenzies where the journalists have tried to stick the word "racist" onto someone like a manic game of pinning the tail on a donkey.  Most decent people feel uneasy about these events - why?

Racism is wrong, we all share the same humanity.  We all love, ache and bleed.  Surely, if racism is wrong then how can modern "anti-racism" be wrong?  The answer is simple,  we all share the same humanity,  we all love, ache and bleed and to set upon another person as if they are less than a dog because someone has pinned the word "racist" or the word "Jew" on them is racist.

The essence of racist groups, including modern anti-racists, is to be part of a gang, as a gang it is easy to discount the humanity of others. Modern anti-racists have a gang mentality and, unable to accept criticism, they attack anyone who criticizes the gang of being "racist".  How did we get to this debased state of teaching our children to behave like National Socialist Brown Shirts? One thing of which we can be pretty certain is that none of us are holy.  If we are posing as holy it is just to please other group members.  Decent people try to understand other people's alienation and attachment to locality.

The least holy of all are those who look at an ordinary English person with Irish great, great grandparents, and say "don't call him spud or I'll report you!", so turning a fellow citizen into a foreigner to be pitied.  Or those who "protect" someone from words such as "nigger" by pitying them because their ancestors two centuries ago may have been slaves.  This sickening "holiness" is about being superior and not holy at all.  A British citizen is a British citizen and not to be placed in a foreign group of those to be pitied.  British people should tell abusers not to be rude and abusive, it is an issue about interpersonal manners and politeness, people are not holy if they slyly side with the abuser by out-grouping the abused.

Where did this racist anti-racism originate?  It came from the the postmodern media and  International Socialists.  Dont believe it? Then click on one of the links. It could be argued that the anti-racist movement invented their own racism but it is far more likely that they became racist as a result of organised activity. The heart of Marxist revolutionary politics is the polarisation of society and the modern postmarxists have seized on the racist/anti-racist dialectic as the perfect polariser.  Postmodern journalists in particular have turned anti-racism into a particularly nasty form of racism although they are largely creepily doing this to serve the globalising needs of their bosses.

The desire to control immigration is a sensible reaction to the coming climatic and economic crises  (see The Limits to Growth and The melting of arctic ice) as well as a sensible reaction to current youth unemployment and unemployment amongst the Black British.  The attempt to label this reaction as "racist" is a revolutionary attempt to ensure that these crises occur, an approach that is supported by globalising corporate interests for whom growth now is the only creed.

Few people seem to realise that the International Socialists (aka Socialist Workers Party) and the postmarxists have moved from the class war to racism to get revolution.  It is for decent people to object to this demonisation of whole groups of people and resist those for whom destruction is more important than cooperation. 

If you went to university were there active "right wing" organisations hoping to replace democracy with one party rule?  Probably not, but there were almost certainly extreme socialist organisations.  It is peculiar that despite the evidence of their own senses, actually seeing socialist subversive politics, people can be persuaded to believe that the threat to freedom and harmony comes from some mythical "rightist" organisation. Most people have seen the real threat and have missed it.  Isn't it time that we realised that the main threat to our wealth and freedom is from extreme socialists, whether National Socialists or International Socialists?
See The political spectrum
Any political spectrum depends upon its axes, I value freedom, do you?   Who can doubt that the North Koreans and Chinese are anything but old fashioned Nationalist Socialists? Who can doubt that extreme socialism is the only real threat to freedom. Mussolini's Fascists were a breakaway party from the revolutionary socialists, Hitler's National Socialists were a socialist Workers Party.  They were both just like Maoism or Communism.  Stalin and Hitler were allies at the outbreak of World War II.  Yet it is the democrats and libertarians who are always accused of "rightism", "racism" and oppression by the postmarxists in the media.

In the early to mid-twentieth century the British Liberals showed that you can have public health and security as well as freedom.  Caring is not socialist, it is Liberal (with a capital "L").

(Link in Twitter with: http://tinyurl.com/o7t4b6b )

POLITICAL THOUGHTS click here to see the whole POLITICAL THOUGHTS magazine!

 

See

Against racism

Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism

Is the pro-immigration lobby racist?

The political spectrum

The Roots of New Labour


Do you have good intentions? - is morality possible without structure?

Multiculturalism

The London Riots and the Mediocracy

The BBC Guide to postmodern journalism

Nations are the unit of diversity


First published 4/5/13

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b...
35 comments
Read more

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H...
3 comments
Read more

The Roots of New Labour

This article was written in 2009 but is still useful to understand the motivation behind New Labour - from the global financial crisis through the over-regulated, surveillance society to the break up of the UK into nationalities. The past lives of Labour Ministers have long been sanitised and many biographies that include their shady communist and Marxist pasts are inaccessible or removed from the net. The truth about these guys is similar to discovering that leading Tories were members of the Nazi Party. If you are a British voter and do not think that this is important then I despair for British politics.  Had these people taken jobs in industry their past might be forgotten and forgiven but they continued in left wing politics and even today boast of being "Stalinist" or International Socialist (or in Blair's case, Trotskyist ). Peter Mandelson (first Secretary of State and Labour Supremo): "Mr Mandelson was born into a Labour family - his grandfather wa...
15 comments
Read more