Skip to main content

Globalization and Global Warming

James Lovelock was on the radio this morning talking about global warming. He made the chilling prediction that about six billion people will die before the end of this century. When asked about what we should do in Britain he said we should prepare to receive vast numbers of refugees.

I have already written about the catastrophe that will probably strike our children or grandchildren (See Global warming: what do we do now). It is vaguely shocking that Lovelock recommends that the UK should receive large numbers of refugees. No doubt he would like to appear generous with our land and resources when he speaks on the radio but the issue is not so simple. At present the UK produces about 65-70% of its staple food requirement (see DEFRA report) and so Britain's own agriculture can support about 45 million of its 65 million people. The introduction of advanced farming techniques and the induction of more land into agriculture might feed 65 million. So, in the best conditions the UK can feed its current population.

The really big problem is not whether Britain can feed its current population, it is how many people Britain can feed when global warming is fully under way, sea levels have risen by over a metre and there has been a collapse in the global food economy. The answer is simple: Britain will be able to feed less than 65 million, probably far less. Lovelock's proposal that Britain should welcome an increase in population because the refugees have nowhere else to go seems like a desire to see us all die. We might begin OK, we might be able to feed the people for a few years but then there will be a catastrophic drought, the population will consume every last drop of water and everybody will be at risk from dying.

Lovelock's thinking on the population issue is typical of the British. It is 50 years since the sun set on the British Empire but British political thinkers still think globally. This is very dangerous because global stability depends upon a diversified global economy with each political unit striving for local self sufficiency. This is obvious because, for example, if all ships were to be produced in China and China underwent a catastrophe then the whole world would be without ships. Stability of supply depends upon diversity.

Lovelock's globalized thinking is ironic because it is globalization that is largely to blame for global warming. Fossil fuels are acquired from overseas to power our cars, population growth is driven by cheap food production in other countries and international trade encourages India and China to produce vast amounts of carbon dioxide at precisely the moment when this should be stopped. The British have been at the forefront of this globalizing tendency for the past two centuries but if we are to survive the next two centuries we need to think in terms of local self sufficiency and maintaining a careful balance between our population and our natural resources.




DEFRA. Ensuring the UK’s Food Security in a Changing World. A Defra Discussion Paper. July 2008 www.defra.gov.uk/foodrin/policy/pdf/Ensuring-UK-Food-Security-in-a-changing-world-170708.pdf

Comments

Greg_L-W. said…
Play catchup and learn some facts about AGW at:
http://gl-w.blogspot.com/2009/11/209-booker-debunks-agw-climate-change.html

regards,
Greg L-W.
John said…
Well, whatever the truth, British industry has to produce for the prevailing fashion. No-one is buying tungsten filament bulbs nowdays.

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage