We are Running out of Water: Tell us something new.

The population of the UK is increasing by 500,000 people a year. Half a million people is a city full of people every year. The Headlines? Climate change: Water shortages in England 'within 25 years'. The quote:

"...wasting water [should] become "as socially unacceptable as blowing smoke in the face of a baby. We all need to use less water".

Of course, water shortages are not really news in the UK, they have become more acute over the past 20 years and may become an "existential" threat in 25 years. What is interesting is that the real cause of the water shortages, the ever growing population, is simply ignored and "climate change" is blamed.

Later on in the BBC article it hints: "So: climate change plus growth equals an existential threat,". Notice the reticence about mentioning "population growth".

If the population is allowed to grow by half a million a year for the next 25 years there will be over 12 million extra people on this small island. The population will have increased by a fifth. This is surely a far more critical event than climate change. Furthermore, given that climate change is happening, it must be insane to deliberately increase the UK population. Yes, deliberately.

The UK population is increasing almost entirely as a result of migration. See Why are people pressing for more migration?.

UK population growth is deliberate.

The BBC did not dare say: "So: climate change plus migration equals an existential threat". The BBC works by suppressing news.

Who on earth would be deliberately increasing the population in the face of such warnings? It is the people who created and increased global warming in the first place: the big energy companies, car companies and multinational corporations and their corporate media.

Sometimes I think the electorate has gone mad. They are fanatically supporting the multinational corporations that are causing global warming and population pressure. They are screaming for the removal of sustainable borders and demanding ever increasing growth. It is almost like we have been turned into suicidal, corporate parrots by the corporate media.

19/03/2019

Comments

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith. What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas? In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands. The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata. The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile. In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president. Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer, recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue? What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems. Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out. The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark. Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions. The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage

Political Thoughts - the magazine

Search This Blog